GLOBALKRATOM.ORG · Evidence-based policy resources
Public Comments Are Open

How to Write a Comment That HHS Will Actually Read

Learn how to write a thoughtful, evidence-based comment that becomes part of the administrative record.

Estimated time: 5–10 minutes Deadline: July 31, 2026
14,000+
Poison center exposures (CDC)
1,151
Kratom-detected deaths (2023)
1 Understand
2 Prepare
3 Write
4 Submit

Why Your Comment Matters

The Policy Position

Banning one chemical does not go far enough. We need to ban whole-leaf natural kratom — the parent plant of 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH).

The FDA-sponsored clinical trial demonstrated that ordinary leaf kratom — not just extracts — produces drug liking, feeling high, and measurable 7-OH in human blood. Regulating only 7-OH while leaving whole-leaf kratom legal will not protect public health. Manufacturers can reformulate, and consumers can still access the parent plant. The evidence shows that whole-leaf kratom itself is psychoactive and carries dependence, toxicity, and abuse liability.

Five Characteristics of an Effective Comment

1

Explain why you care

"I'm a pharmacist."
"I'm a parent."
"I own a business."
2

Stay focused

Don't try to cover everything. Pick 2–3 issues.

3

Support your opinion

Mention scientific literature, community observations, or professional experience.

4

Be respectful

Professional comments are easier to read.

5

Use your own words

Avoid copying other comments.

Questions HHS Needs Your Opinion On

Answer these questions in your comment. Each one expands with guidance on why HHS is asking.

Is regulating only one chemical sufficient when the parent plant produces the same effects?

HHS is considering whether to regulate 7-OH alone or the entire kratom plant. The FDA clinical trial showed whole-leaf kratom produces 7-OH in the body. If only 7-OH is banned, manufacturers could sell whole-leaf kratom that converts to 7-OH in the body.

If manufacturers change formulations, should federal policy adapt?

HHS wants to understand whether a chemical-by-chemical approach is sufficient. As manufacturers reformulate to evade regulation, policy must be able to adapt. Whole-leaf kratom is the parent plant — banning it addresses the root source.

Should products sold in vape shops and gas stations receive broader oversight?

HHS is gathering information about where kratom is sold. Whole-leaf kratom is widely available in convenience stores, gas stations, and vape shops — often with no age verification or health warnings.

What impact do these products have in your community?

HHS wants to understand the real-world impact of whole-leaf kratom. Community observations — even without scientific citations — help agencies understand the scope of the problem.

What evidence do you think HHS should consider about whole-leaf kratom and mitragynine?

HHS is asking the public to point them to the most compelling evidence. The FDA clinical trial, CDC mortality data, and poison center reports all document whole-leaf kratom and mitragynine harms.

Should federal policy address whole-leaf kratom and mitragynine as the parent compounds of 7-OH?

HHS is weighing whether to target 7-OH alone or the parent plant. The evidence shows whole-leaf kratom and mitragynine are themselves psychoactive and carry dependence and toxicity risks.

Evidence You May Wish To Review

All of the evidence on this site documents harms associated with whole-leaf kratom and mitragynine — not extracts, not 7-OH isolates. Click any card below.

Common Mistakes

Copying someone else's comment
Making unsupported claims
Writing only one sentence
Personal attacks
Going off topic

Before You Submit

Is it in your own words?
Did you explain why you care?
Did you support your opinion?
Did you stay on topic?
Would someone unfamiliar with the issue understand your point?

Make Your Voice Part of the Public Record

Your comment matters. Every thoughtful submission helps shape federal policy.

Comment Now
Comment on Regulations.gov